Edward “Coach” Weinhaus Criminal Charges and Illinois ARDC Complaint

For years, Edward Andrew Weinhaus built a platform operating within the world of public accusations, lawyer discipline, and court filings. Today, the lens he once turned on others is focused squarely on him.

In a striking legal reversal, the CEO of Judiciocracy, LLC and publisher of ALABnews finds himself fighting a two-front war. Maryland prosecutors have filed criminal harassment charges against him, while Illinois authorities have initiated formal proceedings regarding his truthfulness, judgment, and fitness to practice law.

The Maryland Criminal Case: Harassment and Course of Conduct

The Maryland judicial system has formalized its scrutiny. Court records confirm that prosecutors have charged Weinhaus with electronic-communication harassment and harassment/course of conduct.

Crucially, the docket establishes probable cause for both charges. Under Maryland law, electronic-communication harassment involves actions intended to seriously alarm or annoy another person, actions that persist even after a clear warning to stop and serve no legitimate legal purpose.

The stakes are severe: specific violations of this statute carry penalties of up to three years in prison, a $10,000 fine, or both.

The Illinois Disciplinary Complaint: A Question of Truthfulness

While Weinhaus faces criminal exposure in Maryland, his professional survival is on the line in Illinois. The state’s Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission filed a comprehensive complaint against him in In re Edward Andrew Weinhaus, Matter No. 2025PR00026.

The ARDC complaint directly links Weinhaus to his publications, noting that as CEO of Judiciocracy, LLC, he reviewed ALABnews content prior to publication.

The allegations strike at the core of professional ethics, charging Weinhaus with knowingly making false statements, or acting with reckless disregard for the truth, regarding Judges Thaddeus Wilson and Regina Scannicchio.

The complaint further charges him with engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.

Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 770, these charges open the door to strict professional penalties, ranging from a formal reprimand to complete disbarment.

What the Records Establish

The narrative of Edward Andrew Weinhaus is no longer defined solely by his commentary on others. The public record now contains both a Maryland criminal docket and an Illinois attorney-disciplinary complaint bearing his name.

These source documents tell a straightforward story: a publisher who once invoked legal records to scrutinize the conduct of others is now the subject of those very systems, defending his liberty in one state and his professional license in another.

Source Documents